Legislature(2007 - 2008)
2007-05-12 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2007-05-12 Senate Journal Page 1242 SB 53 Senator Stevens requested that the reconsideration on CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 53(FIN) "An Act making and amending appropriations, including capital appropriations, supplemental appropriations, and appropriations to capitalize funds; ratifying certain expenditures; and providing for an effective date" be taken up. The bill was before the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Therriault moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 1 which had been offered and withdrawn May 11 (page 1210). Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Therriault moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Stevens objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 53(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Dyson, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Cowdery, Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, McGuire, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Thomas, Wielechowski and so, Amendment No. 1 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 53(FIN) was automatically in third reading on reconsideration. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 53(FIN) "An Act making and amending appropriations, including capital appropriations, supplemental appropriations, and appropriations to capitalize funds; ratifying certain expenditures; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2007-05-12 Senate Journal Page 1243 CSSB 53(FIN) Third Reading - On Reconsideration Effective Dates YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Cowdery, Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, McGuire, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Thomas, Wielechowski Nays: Bunde, Dyson, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 53(FIN) passed the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Stevens moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clauses. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.